This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banauch, G. I.
Right arrow Articles by Prezant, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Banauch, G. I.
Right arrow Articles by Prezant, D. J.

Original Research and Critical Analysis

Trial of Prophylactic Inhaled Steroids to Prevent or Reduce Pulmonary Function Decline, Pulmonary Symptoms, and Airway Hyperreactivity in Firefighters at the World Trade Center Site

Gisela I. Banauch, MD, Gabriel Izbicki, MD, Vasilios Christodoulou, Michael D. Weiden, MD, Mayris P. Webber, DrPH, Hillel Cohen, DrPH, Jackson Gustave, MPH, Robert Chavko, MD, Thomas K. Aldrich, MD, FCCP, Kerry J. Kelly, MD and David J. Prezant, MD, FCCP

Address correspondence and reprint requests to David J. Prezant, MD, FCCP, New York City Fire Department, Office of Medical Affairs (Room 4w-1), Brooklyn, NY 11201 (e-mail: prezand{at}fdny.nyc.gov).

Background: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most effective anti-inflammatory treatment for asthmatics. This trial evaluated the effects of prophylactic ICS in firefighters exposed to the World Trade Center disaster.

Methods: Inhaled budesonide via a dry powder inhaler (Pulmicort Turbuhaler, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE) was offered on-site to New York City firefighters between September 18 and 25, 2001. One to 2 years later, firefighters (n = 64) who completed 4 weeks of daily ICS treatment were evaluated and compared with an age- and exposure-matched comparison group (n = 72) who did not use ICS.

Results: When spirometry results at the final visit were compared with those from the weeks following the 9/11 disaster, the treatment group had a greater increase in forced vital capacity (P = .009) and possibly a slower decline in forced expiratory volume at 1 second (P = .11), as well as a greater improvement in perceived well-being as assessed by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (P < .01). There was no difference in airway hyperreactivity and no evidence of adverse effects from ICS.

Conclusions: Because the potential for hazardous exposures is great at many disasters, disease prevention programs based on environmental controls and respiratory protection are warranted immediately. Our results suggest that, pending further study with a larger sample, prophylactic ICS should be considered, along with respiratory protection, to minimize possible lung insult.

Key Words: World Trade Center • inhaled corticosteroid • firefighters • pulmonary disease • preventive medicine