First published on October 14, 2009
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, doi:10.1001/DMP.0b013e3181aa2719
© 2009 American Medical Association

Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 2009;3:168.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, L. M.

Special FOCUS

Bethesda Hospitals' Emergency Preparedness Partnership: A Model for Transinstitutional Collaboration of Emergency Responses

David K. Henderson 1*, Michael P. Malanoski 1, Gene Corapi 1, Eugene Passamani 1, Cynthia Notobartolo 1, Chris Gillette 1, Patricia Hawes 1, Laura M. Lee 1

1 Dr Henderson and Ms Lee are with the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. Dr Malanoski and Mr Gillette are with the National Naval Medical Center. Mr Corapi, Dr Passamani, Ms Notobartolo, and Ms Hawes are with the Suburban Hospital Healthcare System.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dkh{at}nih.gov.


arrow
Abstract

The events of September 11, 2001 identified a need for health care institutions to develop flexible, creative, and adaptive response mechanisms in the event of a local, regional, or national disaster. The 3 major health care institutions in Bethesda, MD—the National Naval Medical Center (NNMC), the Suburban Hospital Healthcare System (SHHS), and the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (NIHCC)—have created a preparedness partnership that outstrips what any of the institutions could provide independently by pooling complementary resources. The creation of the partnership initially was driven by geographic proximity and by remarkably complementary resources. This article describes the creation of the partnership, the drivers and obstacles to creation, and the functioning and initial accomplishments of the partnership. The article argues that similar proximity and resource relationships exist among institutions at academic centers throughout the United States and suggests that this partnership may serve as a template for other similarly situated institutions.