This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reaves, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burkle, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reaves, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burkle, F. M., Jr

Original Research and Critical Analysis

Implementation of Evidence-based Humanitarian Programs in Military-led Missions: Part II. The Impact Assessment Model

Erik J. Reaves, DO, MTM&H, Kenneth W. Schor, DO, MPH and Frederick M. Burkle Jr, MD, MPH, DTM

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Erik J. Reaves (e-mail: ereaves{at}usuhs.mil).

The Department of Defense does not implement health-sector humanitarian assistance impact assessments to complement those of the international humanitarian aid community. This oversight fails to meet the recent Department of Defense Directive 3000.05 mandate calling for the application of measures of effectiveness. The decision by the Department of Defense to incorporate humanitarian assistance in stability operations should be supported by evidence-based impact assessments. This article proposes implementation of an impact assessment model in Department of Defense humanitarian assistance operations. The use of an impact assessment model will refocus previously identified information gaps from traditional military input-output management toward a greater emphasis on outcomes. This will help answer which humanitarian activities are successful, which are not, and why. Over time, the use of an impact assessment model will ensure that the Department of Defense and its operational units are learning as an organization while applying evidence-based lessons learned to future stability operations. Most important, the use of this model will both provide better understanding of the role that the Department of Defense has in humanitarian activities and help interpret and transfer these activities to the host nation and international aid community in a timely and efficient manner.

Key Words: humanitarian assistance • civil–military coordination • military medical missions • stability operations • disaster evaluation and monitoring • measures of effectiveness