This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gershon, R. R.M.
Right arrow Articles by Matzner, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gershon, R. R.M.
Right arrow Articles by Matzner, F. J.

Original Research and Critical Analysis

Participatory Action Research Methodology in Disaster Research: Results From the World Trade Center Evacuation Study

Robyn R.M. Gershon, MHS, DrPH, Marcie S. Rubin, MPH, MPA, Kristine A. Qureshi, DNSc, Allison N. Canton, BA and Frederick J. Matzner, MD

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Robyn R.M. Gershon, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St, Suite 1004, New York, NY 10032 (e-mail: rg405{at}columbia.edu).

Objective: Participatory action research (PAR) methodology is an effective tool in identifying and implementing risk-reduction interventions. It has been used extensively in occupational health research, but not, to our knowledge, in disaster research. A PAR framework was incorporated into the World Trade Center evacuation study, which was designed to identify the individual, organizational, and structural (environmental) factors that affected evacuation from the World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 on September 11, 2001. PAR teams—comprising World Trade Center evacuees, study investigators, and expert consultants—worked collaboratively to develop a set of recommendations designed to facilitate evacuation from high-rise office buildings and reduce risk of injury among evacuees.

Methods: Two PAR teams worked first separately and then collectively to identify data-driven strategies for improvement of high-rise building evacuation.

Results: The teams identified interventions targeting individual, organizational, and structural (environmental) barriers to safe and rapid evacuation.

Conclusions: PAR teams were effective in identifying numerous feasible and cost-effective strategies for improvement of high-rise emergency preparedness and evacuation. This approach may have utility in other workplace disaster prevention planning and response programs.

Key Words: evacuation • participatory action research teams • high-rise buildings • workplace