Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS - 2(2): 119-126 2008
© 2008 American Medical Association and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
DOI: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31816c7475
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DiMaggio, C.
Right arrow Articles by Abramson, D.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DiMaggio, C.
Right arrow Articles by Abramson, D.

Concepts in Disaster Medicine

Analyzing Postdisaster Surveillance Data: The Effect of the Statistical Method

Charles DiMaggio, PhD, MPH, PA-C, Sandro Galea, MD, DrPH and David Abramson, PhD, MPH, EMT

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Charles DiMaggio, PhD, MPH, PA-C, Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168 St, Room 1117, New York, NY 10032.

Data from existing administrative databases and ongoing surveys or surveillance methods may prove indispensable after mass traumas as a way of providing information that may be useful to emergency planners and practitioners. The analytic approach, however, may affect exposure prevalence estimates and measures of association. We compare Bayesian hierarchical modeling methods to standard survey analytic techniques for survey data collected in the aftermath of a terrorist attack. Estimates for the prevalence of exposure to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, varied by the method chosen. Bayesian hierarchical modeling returned the lowest estimate for exposure prevalence with a credible interval spanning nearly 3 times the range of the confidence intervals (CIs) associated with both unadjusted and survey procedures. Bayesian hierarchical modeling also returned a smaller point estimate for measures of association, although in this instance the credible interval was tighter than that obtained through survey procedures. Bayesian approaches allow a consideration of preexisting assumptions about survey data, and may offer potential advantages, particularly in the uncertain environment of postterrorism and disaster settings. Additional comparative analyses of existing data are necessary to guide our ability to use these techniques in future incidents.

Key Words: Bayesian • survey • surveillance • data







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Medical Association.